
The AIDS awareness print/TV campaign from the 80s had more of a threatening tone to it than the leaflet advising on precautions to take on nuclear war. Why is that? I'm going off on one a bit here, but the news that Labour are sending out a print campaign to advise on Swine Flu just got me thinking. It also made me think back to Monday when Fred asked who would work for Mc.Donalds.
I would. Definitely. In a heartbeat. It's unethical? I don't care. I'm not getting into graphic design to make the world a better place, I'm not intending to use Photoshop to earn a nobel peace prize. If you were to turn down a job like that, it wouldn't exactly cripple them would it? They'd just hire someone else. And if the price tag attached to work for Mc.Donalds is somewhere in the region of £5,000,000 - then surely it'd be a good idea to work for Mc.Donalds on a graphic design level, then use the massive profits to champion ethical causes, or donate it to an anti-child labour charity?
Bill Hicks hated ad men for a reason, and that reason was this: We are meant to sell our souls to the highest bidder. That is a fundamental nature of our industry, and I'm quite happy with it. I'd work on a print campaign for a political party I disagree with for the right amount. If you are going to be picky about who you work for, then good luck.
Oh, and on a side note, regular, everyday run-of-the-mill Flu kills between 250,000-500,000 people annually. Swine Flu - Don't Die of Paranoia.
No comments:
Post a Comment